Tuesday, July 7, 2015

Fury, Frustration, and Finally Joy (Dark Souls 2)

As I’ve continued to fritter away my lunchtimes with electronic entertainment, I’ve begun cutting my teeth on something other than sandwiches: FromSoftware’s 2014 hacky-slashy action role playing game Dark Souls 2. In it, you play as a protagonist seeking to restore his or her sanity, shed an undead curse, and discover the secrets of the crumbling kingdom of Drangleic. “By then, you’ll be something other than human,” a wizened crone intones during the introduction. “A thing that feeds on souls. A hollow.” The game has plot aplenty secreted away item descriptions and beautifully realized settings. But that's not why you'd play.

Really, you'd play it because you like to suffer.

The whole Dark Souls franchise seems founded on the idea that today’s video games are Just Too Easy. It’s not that the games don’t hold your hand; rather, they punch you in the gut and steal your wallet while you’re gasping for breath in some trash-strewn alley. Dark Souls 2 delivers body blows by pitting players against almost unfair gameplay mechanics. See, most roleplaying games provide a way for you to improve your character and buy better gear, and Dark Souls 2 is no different. But the way in which it works makes things devilishly difficult. You get new stuff and better abilities by acquiring souls, those evanescent balls of light left behind after vanquishing enemies. If you yourself die, though, you drop any unspent souls. Sure, you can go back and pick them up again. One of the perks of being undead is that your character never stays in the grave (although each death robs you of your overall health and makes enemies reappear). And what enemies they are. You’ll run into a knife-wielding bandits who can cut you half a dozen times in the blink of an eye, knights wielding a bastard swords the size of Texas, and bug-eyed basilisks that breathe out petrifying fumes. Die to any of these, and those souls you dropped are gone—forever. What's more, monsters start disappearing after you beat them multiple times, which leads to a sickening realization: The supply of souls is finite. Failure has permanent consequences. And you'll fail time after time after time. "Remember, hold on to your souls," the crone from the introduction cackles. "Oh, I'll fool you no longer. You'll lose your souls. All of them. Over and over again."

I'm sure you're getting the picture even though I'm leaving out plenty of details. Beneath its swing-sword-kill-monster exterior, Dark Souls 2 fairly seethes with complexity. Weapons and armor break at the most inopportune times. Secret locations hide in plain sight behind statues that seem a little too human. And thanks to the wonders of the Internet, other players can invade your world when you least expect it, ready to extract their pound of flesh. It's the kind of game where frustration and fury can suddenly give way to ecstatic joy when you triumph over the enemy you once thought unassailable, find a new bonfire (the only respite from conflict), and get one marginal step closer to finding the ruler of Drangleic.

In other words, it's the perfect game for writers.

Surely I’m not the only one who finds the act of writing every bit as brutal as Dark Souls 2’s unforgiving action. I start with a sentence, and my mind seems to congeal like motor oil in mid-February. I pen a paragraph, strike out half of it, and start over. I create and consume and create again. Pencils snap. Computers crash. And friends and family often carve out their own chunks from whatever finished draft they happen to peruse. Disaster is common. Triumph is rare. But such small successes, such iterative steps are so sweet that they compel you to push on. Fury, frustration—and finally joy. That’s just the way I like it.

(Picture: CC 2014 by Midhras)


Phil W said...

Since you pointed out this post, I've been watching gameplay videos from Dark Souls 1. It's enjoyable. I'd like to try it, but I don't have the means. My family would be repulsed too. I could try Obduction instead. That's the kind of thing I've played in the past anyway.

Loren Eaton said...

Huh. I'd never heard of Obduction before. Looks interesting, although I was never any good at Myst.

I got the first Dark Souls for $5 when it was on sale, but I could never get it working properly. It's a notoriously terrible port from Japanese systems. Dark Souls 2 runs much better, but I suspect I'll never actually finish it. It's such a demanding title, and I'd rather do other things than pour 70 hours into it. Like, you know, write.

Phil W said...

I loved Myst, Riven, and Exile. URU is beautiful and enjoyable too.

I think the bugs are mentioned in the Honest Trailer for the three Dark Souls games. The player I'm following doesn't appear to have any trouble like that. He's using X-Box Live about four years ago.

Loren Eaton said...

That Honest Trailers spot is correct when it says that the main strategy for beating bosses is to poke them in the nethers. Everyone likes to complain about dodgy hitboxes, but in my limited experience, I never had much trouble with them.

Phil W said...

I keep watching the Ghostrobo playthrough for Dark Souls. It's fun. I wish I could play it myself, but the family would complain. I even showed my eldest daughter one fight sequence that I thought she'd appreciate, but no. She disliked every part of it.

Loren Eaton said...

Dark Souls definitely falls on the grimdark side of the fantasy scale. Still, I know a lot of people who enjoy the art direction. The first boss in Dark Souls 3 [language warning] is, uh, pretty interesting. I know where you're coming from, though. My wife would recoil if I put that up on the living-room TV.

Phil W said...

Good night!! That's incredible and much bloodier than the first one.

Loren Eaton said...

That's due to the influence of a Lovecraft-inspired title by the same creator called (appropriately enough) Bloodborne. It took everything in a decidedly splattery direction.